Excerpt: Who has not already linked the creation of subatomic particles to light-activated microRNA biogenesis and all biophysically constrained viral latency via the energy-dependent creation of enzymes and receptors in the context of cytosis?
“[W]hat Haldane, Fisher, Sewell Wright, Hardy, Weinberg et al. did was invent…. Evolution was defined as “changes in gene frequencies in natural populations.” The accumulation of genetic mutations was touted to be enough to change one species to another…. Assumptions, made but not verified, were taught as fact.“
The assumptions were replaced by facts. The creation of energy was linked to the creation of RNA in McEwen et al., (1964) Dependence of RNA synthesis in isolated thymus nuclei on glycolysis, oxidative carbohydrate catabolism and a type of “oxidative phosphorylation”
The synthesis of RNA in isolated thymus nuclei is ATP dependent.
What have the so-called science journalists been reporting?
I ask because from November 28 until January 1, 2019 my Tweets @microRNApro earned 158.0K impressions. For example, on Thursday, November 29, 2018 my 29 tweets made 26,287 impressions.
There has been no discussion of the facts about light-activated microRNA biogenesis, despite the links to the literature that I have provided in more than 11,000 tweets during the past few years.
These are the top tweets preceded by the number of impressions since then.
@MaoLunW @GeneticsGSA @PlantEvolution @umncbs @gmivienna @CofC
See the Pulitzer Prize winning novel “Arrowsmith.” (1925), The author won the 1930 @NobelPrize in literature, and Eugene Koonin admits: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/suzan-mazur/riding-the-evolution-paradigm-shift-with-eugene-koonin_b_7217216.html The entire evolution of the microbial world… and the interaction between microbes and viruses… have been left out
Re: “…we have likely documented…the initial steps of a possible path of virus-mediated horizontal transfer of chromosomal DNA between plant species.” See: “Virus-mediated archaeal hecatomb in the deep seafloor” for the link to all pathology. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/10/e1600492.full
Others are getting very close to linking naturally occurring RNA interference to biophysically constrained viral latency via chromosomal rearrangements as detailed in my model of food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled reproduction. https://t.co/D0rWuO7eWT
Who has not already linked the creation of subatomic particles to light-activated microRNA biogenesis and all biophysically constrained viral latency via the energy-dependent creation of enzymes and receptors in the context of cytosis?
See also my review of the pseudoscientific nonsense Kevin J. Mitchell touted in his book “Innate.”
Ignoring light-activated microRNA biogenesis October 16, 2018
He frames his claims in the context of random mutations and evolved biodiversity despite the facts that serious scientists have detailed. For example, ages 10+ can learn how the creation of subatomic particles must be linked from cytosis to biophysically constrained viral latency and sympatric speciation.
The physiology of reproduction is linked to heredity in species from soil bacteria to humans via EDAR V370A (an amino acid substitution) in mice; in populations found in North and East Asia; and in populations in the New World.
I could go on about the facts about cell type differentiation for hours or refer you to MicroRNA.pro or one of my other domains. Alternatively, you could see the work that was published today: “MicroRNAs buffer genetic variation at specific temperatures during embryonic development” for comparison to our 1996 review of molecular epigenetics: “From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior“
Make no mistake, the lack of discussion about energy-dependent light-activated microRNA biogenesis and ecological adaptations is precisely what has been predicted by everyone who knows how a paradigm shift occurs, and what happens after it has already occurred.
J.B.S. Haldane Quotable Quote “The four stages of acceptance:
1. This is worthless nonsense.
2. This is an interesting, but perverse, point of view.
3. This is true, but quite unimportant.
4. I always said so.”
(Review of The Truth About Death, in: Journal of Genetics 1963, Vol. 58, p.464)”
Serious scientists have arrived at a point where pseudoscientists must claim they always knew mutation-driven evolution was food energy-dependent ecological adaptation and try to explain why they did not link the metabolism of food to pheromone-controlled reproduction in species from microbes to humans.