Dobzhansky (1964) “…the only worthwhile biology is molecular biology. All else is “bird watching” or “butterfly collecting.” Bird watching and butterfly collecting are occupations manifestly unworthy of serious scientists!”
Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology “But we can now see the Modern Synthesis as too restrictive and that it dominated biological science for far too long. Perhaps the elegant mathematics and the extraordinary reputation of the scientists involved blinded us to what now seems obvious: the organism should never have been relegated to the role of mere carrier of its genes.”
2013 Nobel Week Nobel Lectures in Physiology or Medicine (starting at 7:00 a.m. Eastern Time/New York on Saturday Dec. 7, 2013)
Information about James Rothman’s Nobel Lecture The Principle of Membrane Fusion in the Cell
—————————-
Information about Randy W. Schekman’s Nobel Lecture Genetic and biochemical dissection of the secretory pathway
—————————-
Information about Thomas C. Südhof’s Nobel Lecture A Molecular Machine for Neurotransmitter Release
Clearly, there are Biophysical constraints on randomly expressed genes and those constraints continue to be addressed by Nobel Laureates year after year. It is time that those who Dobzhansky inferred were no more than bird watchers and butterfly collectors to learn what is currently known about the molecular biology of adaptions and incorporate it into what they tell others about changes that are obviously nutrient-dependent and pheromone-controlled in all species.