Excerpt: A young earth creationist perspective is rarely incorporated into neuroscientific studies because neuroscientists typically do not need to tout their religious beliefs or include them in their published works or presentations.
These data indicate that human proviral content exhibit more extensive interindividual variation than previously recognized. These findings have important implications for our understanding of the contribution of HERVs to human physiology and disease.
Extrapolation of their data for use in my model also links the creation of sunlight from microRNA biogenesis to biophysically constrained viral latency in all living genera. The physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction in species from microbes to humans during the past ~6000 years is linked to partial protection from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA. Serious scientists have linked the degradation of messenger RNA from mutations to all pathology. Pseudoscientists and other theorists have linked the mutations to evolution.
SARCASM ALERT: However, this is a preprint. It has not been peer-reviewed.
See for comparison: The band of biologists who redrew the tree of life
…although molecular phylogenetics provided the means with which to build a universal tree of life that includes microbes, it also provided the data that ultimately led us to question the precise nature of the tree.
The precise nature of the tree links the past ~6000 years of life on Earth from the Virus-mediated archaeal hecatomb in the deep seafloor to epigenetically effected food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled Genomic Energy Landscapes via the molecular basis for extreme ecological adaptation in snakes.
Although no experimental evidence of top-down causation supports claims about more than ~6000 years of ecological adaptation, it is interesting to compare claims about ecological adaptation to the theory of snake-centric human evolution in Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes.
Although the visual system must be involved in the preferential ability to detect snakes rapidly and preconsciously or automatically, the neurological basis for this ability has not yet been elucidated, perhaps because an evolutionary perspective is rarely incorporated in neuroscientific studies.
The most likely reason for the failure to incorporate any evolutionary perspective into the context of neuroscientific studies is because serious scientists laugh at the claims of theorists. No serious scientist since Darwin has suggested that anything except biophysically constrained “conditions of life” could be linked to all biodiversity on Earth via the physiology of quantized energy-dependent reproduction.
However, pseudoscientists have published multiple attempts to convince the biologically uninformed human populations of the world that evolution occurs in the context of articles like these:
A young earth creationist perspective is rarely incorporated into neuroscientific studies because neuroscientists typically do not need to tout their religious beliefs or include them in their published works or presentations.
But, see for comparison: The Darwin Code: Intelligent Design Without God by Greg Bear
Charles Darwin was wise enough not to pin down what he could not see or know, and so, he did not overly pontificate on how the changeability of nature was encoded, and how that code could be altered in its details.
The fact that even the most ignorant theorist on Earth must admit Greg Bear took a much wiser approach to all issues of ecological adaptation that Darwin considered in his “conditions of life” suggests that human idiocy has prevailed among biologically uninformed theorists, at least since the time the Feynman used theoretical physicists as example of human idiocy.