Life and light-sucking black holes (1)

From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior (1996)

We linked energy-dependent RNA-mediated cell type differentiation to all biodiversity via the physiology of reproduction in the molecular epigenetics section of this review.

A consensus of serious scientists established the fact that all the energy comes from sunlight.

For comparison, a team of pseudoscientists produced an imaginary image of a black hole.

See: First images of a black hole unveiled by astronomers in landmark discovery 4/10/19

“As with all great discoveries this is just the beginning” says @EHTelescope director Shep Doeleman

I reported:

Yes. It’s not so much a discovery as it is another plea for more funding.

Within 12 hours, that tweet and others made more than 45,000 organic impressions on 4/10/19 and more than 25,000 additional organic impressions on 4/11/19.

No one “liked” the tweets and no discussion ensued. But, more importantly, no one visited this blog site. Not one person.

I received one notification when an antagonist insulted me:

Oh you have no idea. Kohl is a pseudoscience pusher with a penchant for scientese word salads. He’s obsessed with Kevin, It’s very strange.

I responded: See for ages 10+ Subatomic: and Cytosis: link the creation of anti-entropic virucidal light to all biophysically constrained biodiversity via the physiology of reproduction in flowering plants.

The imaginary imagery failed to include this fact: UV light constrains the formation of new galaxies.

The image was made to fit what pseudoscientists imagined they would see. failed to include light-activated microRNA biogenesis in Innate.

My review of Innate: Ignoring light-activated microRNA biogenesis

I’ve repeatedly linked what is known about the creation of sunlight from energy-as-information to all biodiversity via the physiology of reproduction in species from microbes to humans.

The picture of the Angel Trumpets (at the beginning of this blog post) growing in buckets of water exemplifies all the links from light-activated energy-dependent changes in angstroms to ecosystems via the games for ages 10+.

Who created the black hole?

The imaginary imagery of the black hole, which sucks the light and life out of everything in the Universe, can be compared in the context of the question:

Note: What do the units of uas mean?

It’s micro arcsecond. One arcsecond being itself 1/3600th of a degree.

Is that a unit of energy akin to a femtosecond blast of UV light in the context of biophysically constrained RNA-mediated DNA repair? If so, it might be useful to serious scientists UV-Induced Charge Transfer States in DNA Promote Sequence Selective…

A degree as in an angle, not a temperature/energy. uas (where u is the Greek letter ‘mu’) is the image scale. It’s measured as an angle rather than a distance as we don’t know exactly how far away the object is but we do know the portion of sky it subtends

Thanks. Sorry to see that the measurement of the angle cannot link energy-dependent changes in Angstroms to Ecosystems via what know to serious scientists about light-activated changes in base pairs. Life is Nice to see the ‘angle’ on how black hole suck light.

Conclusion: The imaginary imagery of the black hole sucks the light of creation out of biophysically constrained viral latency and leaves us to look forward to nothing more than unnecessary suffering and premature death linked to what’s left of everything after it is sucked into a black hole.

But see: Photo Of Scientist Creating Her Historic Black Hole Image Goes Viral

Remember: Pseudoscientists believe there is a massive black hole at the center of each galaxy.  If you tell one that ultraviolet (UV) light constrains the formation of galaxies, their failure to consider that fact leads to an inaccurate imaginary image of a black hole that may contain nothing but virucidal UV light, which biophysically constrains all life on Earth via the physiology of reproduction in the context of our visual perception of energy and mass via the creation of the sense of smell in bacteria.

See: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception

See also: Richard Feynman on units of energy

Remember, a microarcsecond is not a unit of energy.

Microarcsecond (μas) is a unit of angle measurement equal to 106 arcsecond

This angle measurement should not have been linked to the light-sucking energy of the black hole without approval from serious scientists.

See for examples: New synthesis models of consistent extragalactic background light over cosmic time

I asked: Do black holes contain UV light? For comparison to news about a light-sucking black hole, they …provide …models [of] extreme-UV energies over a wide range of redshifts… to quantify… variations in the UV [galaxy constraining] background radiation.

Comments

comments

Author: James Kohl

1 thought on “Life and light-sucking black holes (1)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *