Copying Nature’s Design Process (2)

Copying Nature’s Design Process (1)

See also: Structural basis of the nucleosome transition during RNA polymerase II passage

These results provide the foundations for understanding chromatin transcription and epigenetic regulation.

The creation of the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy established the foundation for understanding how light-activated microRNA biogenesis must be linked from seemingly futile cycles of protein biosynthesis and degradation to biophysically constrained viral latency via autophagy and the physiology of reproduction in the context of fixation of the amino acid substitutions that differentiate all cell type in all individuals of all living genera.

For comparison, not even the reports on works by 2018 Nobel Laureates are unaffected by the pseudoscientific nonsense touted in claims about the works of  2018 Chemistry Nobel Laureate Frances A. Arnold, who is the Linus Pauling Professor of Chemical Engineering, Bioengineering and Biochemistry at Caltech.

Historical perspective: Linus Pauling won the 1954  Nobel Prize in chemistry “for his research into the nature of the chemical bond and its application to the eludication of the structure of complex substances.” Although his work on Vitamin C and his advocacy for supplementation was a natural extension of how sunlight would be linked to the stability of all organized genomes by what organisms eat and the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction, on the day that the first nuclear test ban treaty went into effect, October 10, 1963, Pauling received the news that he was to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

For comparison, another expert on nuclear energy shared the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics for “…fundamental work in quantum electrodynamics, with deep-ploughing consequences for the physics of elementary [subatomic] particles.”

Had the historical record not already have linked the energy in what organisms eat to all biophysically constrained biodiversity, others might not have believed Feynman’s prescient comment on the human idiocy exemplified by the 2018 Nobel Laureates in Chemistry.

See:

For comparison see:  Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Scientists Who Put Light to Work

But wait, see also:  Nobel Prize in Chemistry Is Awarded to 3 Scientists for Using Evolution in Design of Molecules

What about sunlight as the only source of energy for biophysically constrained viral latency? How did the Nobel Laureates in Chemistry use anything known about the design of molecules by placing the design back into the context of neo-Darwinian theory?

Thank God, the epigenetic effects of light-activated microRNA biogenesis on the transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of healthy longevity or the effects of viruses on the evolution of pathology were placed into the context of the 2018 Nobel Prize in Medicine Awarded to 2 Cancer Immunotherapy Researchers

All three of the articles above were published in the New York Times. I linked the coverage of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for “directed evolution of enzymes” to the coverage of Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Judge Kavanaugh in this discussion attempt about “Fact Checking Christine Blasey Ford’s Testimony on memory

See for example: ‘Indelible in the Hippocampus Is the Laughter.’ The Science Behind Christine Blasey Ford’s Testimony

There was no science behind her testimony. But most people are unlikely to see the connection from energy to the creation of the immune system to the design of all molecules that biophysically constrain viral latency. Only serious scientists would use the creation of sunlight and the innate immune system to link the creation of all molecules to immunotherapy.

False flag terrorists try to prevent most people from recognizing how biophysically constrained viral latency must be linked to immunotherapy and all biodiversity. Typically, each time I expose a false flag terrorist they run and hide, not literally but figuratively.

In any case, I enjoy it.  In this case, I wrote: Don’t forget to take your “charmed fairy chemical derivatives” with you because Richard Griffiths was more antagonistic than many other who have come before him.

I congratulate you on being the most convoluted form of conspiracy troll I’ve ever come across.

You expose nothing but quite lurid, involved fantastical intellectual masturbation.

That is how most conspiracists appear to me, you are simply a better class of the same.

By virtue of your specialised academic achievement you are fooled in believing your opinion inviolate, as if unable to be incorrect in any matter whatsoever, and upon this fairy foundation in the sky, you build higher and airier fantasy castles, assuming all the while that your intellect means you cannot be wrong.

Yes, yes you can. You can be wrong in even more ways than an average man.

I’m quite average, quite ordinary, read a few books, program a few programs and therefore, rightfully assume that I count myself lucky if I’m correct fifty percent of the time.

Enough confidence to speak out when I see intellectual arrogance and distorted reasoning such as your own.

In your field of micro rna research, know nothing much but what rna is and does, the role of the ribosome and the merest hint of how polypeptides are built up from amino acids and so on. A high school level of knowledge.

In this, you know world more.

In argumentation, in rational debate and reasoning, however, outside of your science, you are a distorted child. And an average mane more than your equal.

You have serious distortions in your thinking on this matter that is scary.

I’m content to leave the matter at hand to true experts, I hope.

Have fun. You do not live in the real world.

James Kohl to Richard Griffiths

RE: “…the merest hint of how polypeptides are built up from amino acids”
 

You fool. Like many others I have linked the creation of the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy from angstroms to ecosystems in all living genera via light-activated microRNA biogenesis and the fixation of amino acid substitutions in the organized genomes of all living genera. The pheromone-constrained fixation of amino acid substitutions in species from microbes to humans links what organisms eat from supercoiled DNA to the prevention of all disease via the physiology of reproduction.

Richard Griffiths to James Kohl

No-one in history has managed to dissuade a conspiracy thinker from believing in the distorted, blinding logic virus that is conspiracy thinking. It may be impossible, a mind virus of immense cunning and adroitness. This is how cults work, how fundamentalism works and how good people come to believe it is right to restrict the rights of others merely because they are of different race, religion or sexuality.

The mind virus, the conspiracy delusion is able to dissuade the thinker from examining their own delusions with great craft, coming up with answer after answer as to why the delusion is the correct belief.

I’ve experienced it.

The only cure was deliberate study of reasoning and rational thought. Logical distortions, cognitive distortions and bias.
Even today, in a small and not so important part of my life, I experience this. However my private beliefs belong to me, have no impact on others and do not include any excuse for harming others, restricting people’s rights or even attempting to persuade them of my own beliefs.

I also know these kinds of beliefs to be false, unproveable and of no other benefit except for some emotional satisfaction. I’d be wrong to persuade others to follow them.

I call them superstitions.

There is some small comfort to be had for the conspiracist—who is likely unable to believe that they are one such thinker—it does take a fairly intelligent mind to be infected this way.
Unfortunately, the only cure comes from within a person, based upon hard work seeking out the objective truth in the world. For too many, this is impossible, they cannot see outside of the delusion they fervently believe in. It is too well hooked in with distorted logic and unconscious suppression of any factual evidence that denies their beliefs.

The Kavanagh case is fairly simple in reality: either Ford is telling the truth and remembering correctly or she is not, either through memory or otherwise. Occam’s razor tells me the simplest explanation that covers the situation is likely the truth.

Either he is guilty or he is not.

There is no evidence of anything more at this time and I dismiss without qualm conspiracy nonsense built out of nonsense. Someone else mentioned Hitchin’s quote and it is apt.

Until a court of law proves something, we are all wasting an awful lot of hot air in this thread—though some of us are having fun I think, and some of us are enjoying being trolls.

Richard Griffiths  made no attempt to substantiate his allegation that I am a troll, and nothing substantiated the allegations made by Christine Blasey-Ford, who claimed Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her.

I made no claims about conspiracies. So, what on Earth is Richard Griffiths claiming?

If he is not a false flag terrorist concealed among the members of the Neuroscience FB group, what is he doing there?Why antagonize me, if he cannot comment on my publication history or presentations during the past 22 years?

It might take an FBI investigation to find out. But, until then, all serious scientists can link his claims that I am a troll to the claims made by Christine Blasey Ford who has published 60+ articles that attest to her lack of scientific credibility, which attests to the lack of credibility of her allegations against Brett Kavanaugh.

Comments

comments

Author: James Kohl

1 thought on “Copying Nature’s Design Process (2)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *